Category: Family

Sports dietary analysis

Sports dietary analysis

Nutritional and supplementation strategies to analyeis and attenuate exercise-induced muscle damage: a brief review. Rather, some key determinants are described below using the COM-B system. Eur J Clin Nutr. Sports dietary analysis

Sports dietary analysis -

However, dietary intake, eating behaviours, and its determinants are inconsistently defined in the literature, requiring nutrition practitioners to navigate a complicated landscape of concepts and terminology. This is further complicated by limitations in practically measuring and influencing eating behaviours and dietary intake.

The proposed Athlete Nutrition Development Approach was developed to aid practitioners in servicing decisions through the athlete development process, through a three-tiered approach to sport nutrition service delivery.

Tier 1 addresses the determinants of eating behaviours, Tier 2 directly addresses eating behaviours and dietary intake, and Tier 3 addresses the consequences of dietary intake in relation to health and sport performance.

Each tier includes tools for assessment and development. Dietary intake has a profound influence on athlete health and sport performance [ 1 ]. It is therefore important to account for eating behaviours, given their direct influence on dietary intake [ 2 , 3 ].

In the most general sense, behaviour has been described as actions and its determinants and consequences [ 4 ]. However, eating behaviours, dietary intake, determinants, and consequences are vaguely or inconsistently defined [ 3 , 5 ].

Some authors have differentiated between behaviours that precede food entering the mouth food choices , the act of eating eating behaviours , with eating habits being a subset of eating behaviours, and the results of eating behaviours dietary intake [ 2 , 3 ].

The athlete-centred literature more specifically differentiates habits from behaviours as being regularly repeated behaviours to reduce the need for conscious decision-making [ 6 ]. However, older literature describes this combination of conscious and subconscious decision-making as the food choice process [ 7 ], while other authors use the term eating routines [ 8 ].

Authors have also used the term eating patterns to describe food choices, and the frequency of meals and snacks, which results in nutrient intake defined similarly to dietary intake [ 9 ]. Additionally, concepts such as nutrition literacy and food literacy use ranging definitions from general health knowledge, to specific skills and competencies required to interact within a food system [ 5 ].

Nutrition practitioners working in the field are navigating a complicated landscape of concepts and terminology, compounded with limitations in practically measuring and influencing nutrition-related factors [ 10 , 11 ]. Unfortunately, there is currently no single agreed-upon approach to improve eating behaviours and dietary intake in athletes.

Recent literature outlines nutrition needs for youth athlete development, suggesting various shifts in focus through the athlete development process e.

removing body composition assessments, discouraging supplement use, and promoting eating behaviours and dietary intake that support age-appropriate development [ 12 ], but does not provide an operational approach to manage this outcome.

Interestingly, a new conceptual framework layers sport nutrition services onto stages of development and skill level [ 13 ], but the scope of focus is limited to the assessment of body composition.

The Determinants of Nutrition and Eating DONE framework and taxonomy uses tiers, including factors that precede eating, the actions of eating, and the results of eating [ 2 , 3 ], but is not viewed through a sport nutrition lens, nor does it guide servicing decisions. This paper proposes a novel Athlete Nutrition Development Approach to establish a tiered approach to sport nutrition services Fig.

Tier 1 focuses on the independent, upstream determinants of eating behaviours; Tier 2 focuses directly on eating behaviours and dietary intake; and Tier 3 focuses on the dependent, downstream consequences of dietary intake. Each tier includes a description of the concepts and is comprised of two sections.

The first sections of the approach utilize tools to assess and measure eating behaviours, dietary intake, and their determinants and consequences, while the second section proposes tools to develop and shape eating behaviours, dietary intake, and their determinants and consequences in athletes.

The Athlete Nutrition Development Approach outlining a three-tiered approach that addresses the upstream determinants of eating behaviours Tier 1 , eating behaviours and dietary intake Tier 2 , and the downstream consequences of dietary intake Tier 3 , with the goal of improving athlete health and performance.

Each tier includes an overview of the concepts and suggested tools for assessment and development. Figure created using Lucidchart. Eating behaviours are influenced by a complex set of factors, including both modifiable and non-modifiable variables.

In this paper, these factors will be referred to as the determinants of eating behaviours and will be described using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour COM-B system [ 14 ], given its use within sport nutrition literature to date [ 15 , 16 ].

Capability is defined as the capacity to engage in a behaviour, requiring knowledge and skill [ 14 ]. Opportunity can be described as the external, contextual factors that make a behaviour possible [ 14 ]. Lastly, motivation is the brain processes that direct behaviour both emotional and analytical [ 14 ].

Together, these components are interrelated and create behaviours. It is beyond the scope of this paper to provide an exhaustive list of the determinants of eating behaviours.

Rather, some key determinants are described below using the COM-B system. Additionally, this tier describes tools to measure and shape the determinants within these three components to understand and improve eating behaviours.

Nutrition knowledge and beliefs are primary determinants and can be defined as an awareness and ability to apply nutrition information when choosing foods [ 6 ]. Importantly, athletes identify a lack of knowledge as a barrier to appropriate dietary intake [ 17 ].

Fortunately, nutrition knowledge is modifiable [ 18 ], and evidence suggests that athletes may benefit from sport nutrition education through increases in nutrition knowledge, improved eating habits, changes in body composition, and improved physical performance [ 11 ]. It is noteworthy that nutrition knowledge and beliefs also serve as a lens through which athletes can interpret, both correctly and incorrectly, the impact of other determinants of eating behaviours described below , and the actions and consequences of eating and resulting dietary intake, creating an iterative process where the downstream factors described later in this paper can indirectly serve as determinants of eating behaviours [ 19 ].

Knowledge, skills, and belief alone cannot fully explain eating behaviours. Other modifiable and non-modifiable factors exist and are often complex.

Homeostatic and hedonic hunger influence eating behaviours. if food is available, it is easier to eat. Components of the COM-B system are interrelated and form complex interactions that determine eating behaviours.

Of particular concern are clinical circumstances such as disordered eating in athlete populations [ 20 ] and gastrointestinal disorders [ 1 ], which have complex aetiologies that influence eating behaviours. Table 1 contains a list of possible determinants of eating behaviours, and how they are coded within the COM-B system.

Determinants of eating behaviours can be difficult to assess. Practitioners such as Registered Dietitians RDs have been trained to subjectively and qualitatively assess these determinants. The Nutrition Care Process and Model NCPM is commonly used among RDs and involves four major steps, including nutrition assessment step 1 ; nutrition diagnosis step 2 ; nutrition intervention step 3 ; and nutrition monitoring step 4 [ 21 ].

Steps 2 and 3 will be described in later sections of this paper. Nutrition assessment can be categorized in an A-E framework, including anthropometric A , biochemical B , clinical C , dietary D , and environmental E assessments [ 22 ], with clinical and environmental assessments regarding specific determinants of eating behaviours.

Anthropometric, biochemical, and dietary assessment will be described in later sections of this paper. Documentation can occur in a number of ways, but often utilizes a pre-determined structure such as a Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan note [ 23 ].

An approach such as the NCPM or A-E framework can be highly specific and add a richness to the assessment process, but the individualized and qualitative nature can be time-consuming.

Alternatively, subjective components can be quantified through the use of rating or frequency scales, such as components of the Athlete Food Choice Questionnaire [ 19 ] or Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire [ 24 ], and used within or in addition to subjective nutrition intake forms for quick and widespread distribution.

Nutrition knowledge is one of the main modifiable determinants of eating behaviours [ 18 ]. As such, the development of nutrition knowledge, and therefore assessment of nutrition knowledge, is a critical component of early nutrition development.

Practitioners will often subjectively and qualitatively assess nutrition knowledge along with other determinants as described earlier in this paper. However, validated sport nutrition knowledge questionnaires exist [ 25 , 26 ], allowing for a more thorough and quantified assessment of nutrition knowledge.

Similarly, validated food skills questionnaires exist [ 27 ], providing an opportunity to quantify a different set of determinants, although a subjective assessment by an expert in a kitchen may also be valuable. Although psychological factors can be dependent on dietary intake, this relationship is often bidirectional with mental health being a determining factor in eating behaviours and resulting dietary intake [ 28 , 29 ].

Evidence suggests that female athletes may be especially prone to disordered eating and would benefit from screening [ 30 ], although disordered eating does also occur in males [ 29 ].

Therefore, it is important to assess mental health at early stages of development, and not just as a psychological consequence of dietary intake. Tools, such as the Eating Disorder Examination Interdisciplinary support may be required for assessment in this area.

Nutrition counselling and consultations are commonly used in sport nutrition [ 34 ]. The NCPM is a model to guide practitioners through standardized nutrition service provision [ 21 ]. Nutrition assessment step 1 and nutrition monitoring step 4 are two steps that have been discussed earlier. The nutrition intervention step 3 step involves formulating and delivering a plan of action to address identified problems [ 21 ].

When related to the determinants of eating behaviours, this may require: increasing nutrition knowledge; increasing cooking, food safety, and food management skills; improving awareness of homeostatic and hedonic hunger cues; improving awareness of clinical, social, socio-economic, cultural, and environmental barriers; and improving motivation.

In addition to direct delivery of information, the use of techniques such as motivational interviewing [ 35 ] and intuitive eating [ 36 ]; and theoretical approaches to enhancing intrinsic motivation such as self-determination theory [ 37 ], and the behaviour change wheel [ 14 ], can help athletes develop, although research in athlete populations is lacking.

Delivery of these services can occur in both formal appointments with athletes and practitioners check-ups and informal communication in the daily training environments check-ins. Resources can be distributed directly to athletes live or virtually, or modification of the physical environment such as posting resources in daily training environments can provide athletes with constant, passive exposure to desired information.

The benefits of these services are twofold: they provide athletes with information which aids in development; and they create a positive nutrition culture within and around the athletes. Early adopting athletes can serve as champions [ 41 ], helping positive nutrition culture spread within a group of athletes.

Behaviours are not consistently defined in the literature, with some definitions focussing on behaviours solely as actions or acts [ 3 ], while other definitions include the determinants, correlates, and consequences of actions [ 4 ].

Given the focus on determinants and consequences in other areas of this approach, Tier 2 will emphasize eating behaviours as the actions related to eating and define dietary intake as the results of eating behaviours.

Eating behaviours include food choices, portion sizes, feeding frequency, and feeding time and result in dietary intake: timing and intake of calories, nutrients, fluids, and supplements. Some literature works describe eating habits as a factor interrelated with eating behaviours [ 3 , 6 ].

Specifically, Birkenhead and Slater [ 6 ] describe habits as behaviours that are regularly repeated to reduce the need for conscious decision-making. However, it can be argued that eating habits and any other synonyms used within the literature can still be characterized and described through: the actions of food choices, portion sizes, feeding frequency, and feeding time; and the determinants of these actions.

Therefore, it is acknowledged that eating habits exist, but will not be a term used in this approach as they are not mutually exclusive of food choices, portion sizes, feeding frequency, and feeding time, and the determinants of these actions. This tier revolves around measuring and influencing eating behaviours and resulting dietary intake to optimize adaptation to training and readiness to perform.

Commonly, practitioners look to assess both eating behaviours and dietary intake. However, eating behaviours are transient and difficult to assess. Furthermore, to assess dietary intake, eating behaviours must be coded and analysed using software [ 42 ].

This process takes time, making the assessment of dietary intake more time-consuming than the assessment of eating behaviours [ 22 , 43 ]. Error introduced at the dietary intake level through the coding and analysis process is also a concern [ 44 ].

This section describes the types of eating behaviour and dietary intake assessment tools available to practitioners. Possibly the most salient option is the observation of eating behaviours. This provides an objective look at eating behaviours and removes any reporting error introduced by athlete self-monitoring.

Observation can be blinded or non-blinded, depending on the circumstances. In non-blinded situations where athletes are aware they are being observed, desirability bias may play a factor.

However, blinded observation is not always possible or ethical. Alternatively, prospective assessment of both eating behaviours and dietary intake can be accomplished for a period of time through the use of self-report food logs or intake tracking software [ 22 ].

While this approach has the advantage of gathering very detailed eating behaviour data [ 22 ], these tools are greatly limited by the athlete and practitioner burden, making them unrealistic to complete on a daily basis as well as introducing reporting errors [ 10 , 22 ].

Therefore, new technology looks to reduce this burden [ 45 ], but until these tools have been validated in athletes and dietary intake can be objectively and accurately tracked on a daily basis with ease, the transient nature of eating behaviours and dietary intake challenge the assumption that data collected during a short period of time are representative of days that were not assessed [ 22 ].

Furthermore, prospective tools such as this are limited by desirability bias [ 22 ]. Retrospectively, diet recalls and diet history assessments [ 22 ] can be used in a similar fashion to food logs and coded and analysed with software to determine dietary intake.

While these tools have less athlete and practitioner burden than food logs, they are limited by recall error and the data acquired are not easily quantified with accuracy [ 22 ].

Practitioners may find it more useful to simply use these tools to qualify eating behaviours [ 22 ]. These retrospective tools are often used within the nutrition assessment step 1 and nutrition monitoring step 4 steps of the NCPM [ 21 ].

Often, practitioners will find it easier and more useful to quantify eating behaviours [ 22 ] rather than code and analyse data to quantify dietary intake. Tools such as Food Frequency Questionnaires [ 46 ] can quantify certain eating behaviours [ 10 , 22 ], providing a quantitative alternative to coding and analysing data at a dietary intake level.

Specifically, the Athlete Diet Index has been developed for and validated in athletes, with the purpose of assessing eating behaviours around training and for aspects of diet quality [ 43 , 47 ].

Food Frequency Questionnaires and the Athlete Diet Index are retrospective tools and therefore prone to recall error due to their reliance on memory [ 22 ].

Fortunately, low-burden, prospective assessment tools can also be created for athletes to self-assess eating behaviours. These tools rely less on memory than retrospective tools, although often at the expense of external validity through potential increases in desirability bias [ 22 ].

Tools such as the Food Frequency Monitoring Tool FFMT are easier to implement on a daily basis than food logs or intake tracking software and allow for objective quantification of eating behaviours such as food choices and feeding frequency [ 48 ].

It may be warranted to periodize use of the FFMT throughout a year to minimize recording fatigue and maintain accuracy at key times.

Additionally, assessment questions related to other eating behaviours i. portion sizes and feeding time can be developed and implemented on a daily basis with relative ease e.

what time did you eat breakfast? Athlete Self-Report Monitoring ASRM [ 49 ] can be used to subjectively assess dietary intake using a rating scale on a daily basis. This provides another efficient, prospective assessment tool option, although the focus on assessing dietary intake rather than eating behaviours makes ASRM more nuanced and subjective than the previously mentioned FFMT.

Athletes require adequate understanding of nutrition requirements and nutrient content of the foods they consume to complete ASRM accurately and consistently. For athletes who have adequate nutrition knowledge, ASRM is a viable and practical option.

Similar to the FFMT, it may be warranted to periodize the use of ASRM to minimize recording fatigue. The NCPM nutrition intervention step 3 step [ 21 ] was discussed earlier as the delivery of an action plan to address an identified capability, opportunity, or motivational issue, but action plans can also occur at an eating behaviour and dietary intake level.

Prescribed plans can enable eating behaviours [ 34 ] and may come in the form of food plans that prescribe specific eating behaviours and nutrition plans that prescribe specific dietary intake. This approach can alter eating behaviours and dietary intake quickly; however, adherence to changes in eating behaviours and dietary intake as a direct result of these plans is low [ 50 , 51 ], compared to indirectly through increases in capability, opportunity, or motivation.

Non-compliance with food and nutrition plans is also common, even when there is intention to follow the plan [ 52 ]. Alternatively, some athletes may find it easier to adhere to a nutrition plan over a food plan given the relative increase in opportunity, as there are many different ways to achieve a specific dietary intake.

Food and supplement provision are also common sport nutrition services utilized to improve eating behaviours and dietary intake [ 34 ]. Food and supplement provision reduces the need for an athlete to be capable of making appropriate eating behaviour decisions.

The impact of appropriate dietary intake on the performance of athletes is well established [ 1 ]. Dietary intake can also include the use of supplements such as creatine, beta-alanine, sodium bicarbonate, and caffeine as ergogenic aids to improve performance [ 1 ].

This tier revolves around measuring adaptations to training and readiness to perform and the feedback process used to shape eating behaviours, dietary intake, and their determinants. Once the ability to sustain and modify eating behaviours has been established, and consistent eating behaviours have been demonstrated, the goal of sport nutrition services shifts to optimizing these adaptations and improving readiness to perform at critical periods through appropriate dietary intake.

Identifying the specific desired adaptations and readiness requirements within the pillars of development should be driven by sport experts and will vary between and within sports and individual athletes. Physiological examples include improving body composition and energy availability and increasing glycogen storage.

A psychological example could be improving the management of disordered eating. Technical and tactical examples include improving skills acquisition and decision-making, respectively. Once desired adaptation requirements and readiness requirements are identified, appropriate dietary intake can be informed by existing literature and expertise, to an extent.

Assessing adaptation to training stimulus and determining readiness to perform is a standard practice in high-performance sport settings. Relevant to nutrition services, common areas for assessment include physique, hematological, clinical—physical, clinical—psychological, hydration, and energy requirements.

The same type of Tier 1 psychological assessment tools can be used at this tier given the bidirectional relationship that eating behaviours and dietary intake can have with psychological factors, such as in the case of low energy availability [ 28 , 29 ].

It is important to note that this is not an exhaustive list of the available assessment tools, or a description of how to use these tools.

Table 2 contains assessment tools for assessing consequences associated with dietary intake. Given that Tier 3 is downstream of the actions of eating, there is no direct development that can occur.

Indirectly, information gathered using Tier 3 assessment tools can be used intentionally or unintentionally to inform upstream decision-making. The appropriate selection of key downstream variables for assessing adaptation and readiness is important to inform the use of and response to upstream development tools.

Long-Term Athlete Development frameworks already exist, with many aiming to develop athletes from a foundation of physical literacy through to optimal competition performance [ 56 ]. These frameworks can serve as aides for sport coaches, strength and conditioning coaches, therapists, and performance analysts whose roles involve the development of physical traits in training environments.

Additionally, certain populations and environments have unique dietary intake requirements or challenges that need to be considered when developing athletes [ 1 ]. To meet these unique dietary intake requirements, unique eating behaviours must be demonstrated, but there is a lack of resources to guide practitioners through this athlete development process.

This approach has been presented as a starting point to guide practitioners and should be considered until future work allows for refinement and validation. This conceptual nutrition approach provides three tiers to nutrition development and assessment, with each tier providing a foundation for the next.

Moving through tiers can be a linear or iterative process, and this approach can be used to guide decision-making at a group or individual level. Additionally, athletes can be grouped based on unique dietary intake requirements, to allow for development to be more specific to their needs at each tier, and assessment tools within the tier and downstream can be used to gather data and perform gap analysis to determine development requirements within the group.

At an individual level, with assessment of key factors at each tier, information can be used to guide development within that tier, or fed back upstream to determine development needs. The NCPM terms this step as nutrition diagnosis step 2 , the process of identifying and labelling nutrition problems prior to implementing an intervention [ 21 ].

As an athlete develops, less time should be spent in upstream tiers and more time can be dedicated to downstream tiers. New services at subsequent tiers can be added as development occurs, with or without the removal of prior services.

In ideal situations, athletes operating at a Tier 3 level will have the ability to quickly and sustainably make appropriate adjustments whenever data suggest a change is needed; however, in many cases, gaps in ability will be identified throughout the entire process, and development will need to continue at all three tiers.

It may be practical to deliver services at a group level early in development, with needs being more general. As athletes reach elite levels, individualized support is likely warranted, decreasing the ability and benefit of servicing at a group level. In any case, it is vital that development begins at Tier 1 given the contrast between the sustainability and the rate of development that will occur.

With the lack of direct correlation with health and performance, the direct benefits of addressing determinants e. increasing nutrition knowledge may be delayed and therefore should be developed before optimizing immediate performance is paramount.

In contrast, eating behaviours and dietary intake are transient and can change daily, but are more directly related to desirable adaptations and readiness to perform when needed, allowing for this approach to be compatible within existing dietary intake recommendations for special populations e.

youth athletes and long-term development frameworks. Cultivating appropriate eating behaviours to ultimately enhance health and performance is a complex and interrelated problem, requiring a holistic solution.

Therefore, an approach was designed to aid practitioners in nutrition-related servicing decisions. This approach utilizes three tiers: Tier 1 focuses on the upstream determinants of eating behaviours; Tier 2 focuses directly on eating behaviours such as food choices, portion sizes, feeding frequency, and feeding time and dietary intake such as caloric intake and timing, nutrient intake and timing, fluid intake and timing, and supplement intake and timing; and Tier 3 focuses on the downstream consequences of dietary intake across four pillars of development.

Thomas DT, Erdman KA, Burke LM. Position of the academy of nutrition and dietetics, dietitians of Canada, and the American College of Sports Medicine: nutrition and athletic performance.

J Acad Nutr Diet. Article PubMed Google Scholar. Stok FM, Hoffmann S, Volkert D, Boeing H, Ensenauer R, Stelmach-Mardas M, et al. The DONE framework: creation, evaluation, and updating of an interdisciplinary, dynamic framework 2. Matsunami H, editor. PLoS ONE. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar.

Stok FM, Renner B, Allan J, Boeing H, Ensenauer R, Issanchou S, et al. Dietary Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Conceptual Analysis and Taxonomy. Front Psychol [Internet]. Glanz K, Rimer B, Viswanath K, editors. Chapter 1: The Scope of Health Behavior and Health Education.

Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; Vettori V, Lorini C, Milani C, Bonaccorsi G. Towards the Implementation of a Conceptual Framework of Food and Nutrition Literacy: Providing Healthy Eating for the Population.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health; Basel [Internet]. Basel, Switzerland, Basel: MDPI AG; [cited Jun 1]; Birkenhead KL, Slater G. Sports Med. Furst T, Connors M, Bisogni CA, Sobal J, Falk LW. Food choice: a conceptual model of the process.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar. Jastran MM, Bisogni CA, Sobal J, Blake C, Devine CM. Eating routines. Embedded, value based, modifiable, and reflective. Noll M, Rodrigues de Mendonca C, Rosa LP de S, Silveira EA.

Determinants of eating patterns and nutrient intake among adolescent athletes: a systematic review. Nutrition Journal; London [Internet]. Validity of Dietary Assessment in Athletes: A Systematic Review. Sánchez-Díaz S, Yanci J, Castillo D, Scanlan AT, Raya-González J. Effects of nutrition education interventions in team sport players.

A systematic review. Desbrow B. Youth athlete development and nutrition. Ackerman KE, Stellingwerff T, Elliott-Sale KJ, Baltzell A, Cain M, Goucher K, et al. REDS Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport : time for a revolution in sports culture and systems to improve athlete health and performance.

Br J Sports Med. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions.

Implement Sci. Bentley MR, Mitchell N, Sutton L, Backhouse SH. J Sports Sci. Costello N, McKenna J, Sutton L, Deighton K, Jones B. Using contemporary behavior change science to design and implement an effective nutritional intervention within professional Rugby League. Physical activity: health impact, prevalence,correlates and intervention.

Psychol Health. CrossRef Full Text Google Scholar. Roberts CK, Barnard RJ. Effects of exercise and diet on chronic disease. J Appl Physiol. Kerksick CM, Wilborn CD, Roberts MD, Smith-Ryan A, Kleiner SM, Jäger R, et al.

Pickering C, Kiely J. Are the current guidelines on caffeine use in sport optimal for everyone? Inter-individual variation in caffeine ergogenicity, and a move towards personalised sports nutrition.

Sports Medicine. Ordovas J. Personalised nutrition and health. Br Med J. Stellingwerff T, Morton JP, Burke LM.

A framework for periodized nutrition for athletics. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. Nielsen LLK, Lambert MNT, Jeppesen PB. The effect of ingesting carbohydrate and proteins on athletic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Wu SH, Chen KL, Hsu C, Chen HC, Chen JY, Yu SY, et al. Creatine supplementation for muscle growth: a scoping review of randomized clinical trials from to Gomez-Bruton A, Marin-Puyalto J, Muñiz-Pardos B, Matute-Llorente A, del Coso J, Gomez-Cabello A, et al.

Does acute caffeine supplementation improve physical performance in female team-sport athletes? Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. van de Walle GP, Vukovich MD. The effect of nitrate supplementation on exercise tolerance and performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Strength Cond Res. Bourke BEP, Baker DF, Braakhuis AJ. Social media as a nutrition resource for athletes: a cross-sectional survey. Evaluation of general nutrition knowledge in elite Australian athletes. Br J Nutr. Devlin BL, Belski R. Exploring general and sports nutrition and food knowledge in elite male Australian athletes.

Assessing and improving general and sports nutrition knowledge of Australian athletes view project dietary intakes, nutrition knowledge and the factors influencing dietary behaviours and food choices of professional Australian football athletes view project. Lamarche B, Morissette É, Provencher V, Valois P.

Evaluation of sports nutrition knowledge and recommendations among high school coaches. Article Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. Andrews A, Wojcik JR, Boyd JM, Bowers CJ. Sports nutrition knowledge among mid-major division i university student-athletes. J Nutr Metab. Wardenaar FC, Hoogervorst D.

How sports health professionals perceive and prescribe nutritional supplements to olympic and non-Olympic athletes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Burke LM, Meyer NL, Pearce J.

National nutritional programs for the London olympic games: a systematic approach by three different countries. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser.

Beck KL, Thomson JS, Swift RJ, Hurst Pv. Role of nutrition in performance enhancement and postexercise recovery. Open Access J Sports Med.

Torres-McGehee TM, Pritchett KL, Zippel D, Minton DM, Cellamare A, Sibilia M. Sports nutrition knowledge among collegiate athletes, coaches, athletic trainers, and strength and conditioning specialists.

J Athl Train. Foo W, Faghy MA, Sparks A, Newbury JW, Gough LA. The effects of a nutrition education intervention on sports nutrition knowledge during a competitive season in highly trained adolescent swimmers. Effectiveness of education interventions designed to improve nutrition knowledge in athletes: a systematic review.

Sports Med. Birkenhead KL, Slater G. Hamilton KP, Ziegler J, Samavat H, Wardenaar F, Esopenko C, Womack J, et al. Nutritional supplement use and athletic characteristics among a sample of NCAA division I and division III student-athletes.

J Diet Suppl. Wesana J, Schouteten JJ, van Acker E, Gellynck X, de Steur H. British Food J. Clark JE. Taste and flavour: their importance in food choice and acceptance.

Proc Nutr Soc. Trakman GL, Forsyth A, Hoye R, Belski R. Thurecht RL, Pelly FE. Development of a new tool for managing performance nutrition: the athlete food choice questionnaire.

Corallo A, Latino ME, Menegoli M, Spennato A. A survey to discover current food choice behaviors. Sobal J, Bisogni CA. Constructing food choice decisions. Ann Behav Med. The nutrition for sport knowledge questionnaire NSKQ : development and validation using classical test theory and Rasch analysis.

Zinn C, Schofield G, Wall C. Development of a psychometrically valid and reliable sports nutrition knowledge questionnaire. J Sci Med Sport. Ares G, Gámbaro A. Influence of gender, age and motives underlying food choice on perceived healthiness and willingness to try functional foods.

Arenas-Jal M, Suñé-Negre JM, Pérez-Lozano P, García-Montoya E. Trends in the food and sports nutrition industry: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. Menrad K. Market and marketing of functional food in Europe. J Food Eng. Knapik JJ, Steelman RA, Hoedebecke SS, Austin KG, Farina EK, Lieberman HR.

Prevalence of dietary supplement use by athletes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clarkson PM, Tremblay I. Exercise-induced muscle damage, repair, and adaptation in humans. Clarkson PM, Sayers SP. Etiology of exercise-induced muscle damage.

Can J Appl Physiol. Owens DJ, Twist C, Cobley JN, Howatson G, Close GL. Exercise-induced muscle damage: what is it, what causes it and what are the nutritional solutions? Eur J Sport Sci.

Harty PS, Cottet ML, Malloy JK, Kerksick CM. Nutritional and supplementation strategies to prevent and attenuate exercise-induced muscle damage: a brief review. Sports Med Open. Hulmi JJ, Lockwood CM, Stout JR. Nutr Metab Lond.

Andersen LL, Tufekovic G, Zebis MK, Crameri RM, Verlaan G, Kjær M, et al. The effect of resistance training combined with timed ingestion of protein on muscle fiber size and muscle strength. Metab Clin Exp.

Grgic J, Trexler ET, Lazinica B, Pedisic Z. Effects of caffeine intake on muscle strength and power: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ganio MS, Casa D, Armstrong L. Effect of caffeine on sport-specific endurance performance: a systematic review. Artic J Strength Cond Res. Womack CJ, Saunders MJ, Bechtel MK, Bolton DJ, Martin M, Luden ND, et al. The influence of a CYP1A2 polymorphism on the ergogenic effects of caffeine.

Lanhers C, Pereira B, Naughton G, Trousselard M, Lesage FX, Dutheil F. Creatine supplementation and lower limb strength performance: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Creatine supplementation and upper limb strength performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dvorak J, Junge A, Derman W, Schwellnus M. Injuries and illnesses of football players during the FIFA world cup. Br J Sports Med. Engebretsen L, Soligard T, Steffen K, Alonso JM, Aubry M, Budgett R, et al.

Sports injuries and illnesses during the London summer olympic games. Luna S. This title is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease: why sports nutrition products should be avoided.

Stanford J Public Health. Google Scholar. Lorraine K. Supplement regulation for sports nutrition supplements. J Leg Med.

Close GL, Kasper AM, Walsh NP, Maughan RJ. Lucey A, Heneghan C, Kiely ME. Guidance for the design and implementation of human dietary intervention studies for health claim submissions.

Nutr Bull. Maughan RJ, Burke LM, Dvorak J, Larson-Meyer DE, Peeling P, Phillips SM, et al. IOC Consensus statement: dietary supplements and the high-performance athlete. Hwang J, Lee K, Lin TN. Ingredient labeling and health claims influencing consumer perceptions, purchase intentions, and willingness to pay.

J Foodserv Bus Res. Vento KA, Wardenaar FC. Third-Party testing nutritional supplement knowledge, attitudes, and use among an NCAA I collegiate student-athlete population.

Front Sports Act Living. Browne F, Walsh E, Walton J, Flynn A. The contribution of nutritional supplements to micronutrient intake in Irish adults aged 18—64 years. Cashman KD, Wallace JMW, Horigan G, Hill TR, Barnes MS, Lucey AJ, et al.

Am J Clin Nutr. Martineau AR, Forouhi NG. Vitamin D for COVID a case to answer? Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Cashman KD, Dowling KG, Škrabáková Z, Gonzalez-Gross M, Valtueña J, de Henauw S, et al.

Vitamin D deficiency in Europe: pandemic? Owens DJ, Allison R, Close GL. Vitamin D and the athlete: current perspectives and new challenges. Torres R, Ribeiro F, Alberto Duarte J, Cabri JMH.

Evidence of the physiotherapeutic interventions used currently after exercise-induced muscle damage: systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther Sport. Skinner B, Moss R, Hammond L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of foam rolling on range of motion, recovery and markers of athletic performance.

J Bodyw Mov Ther. Wiewelhove T, Döweling A, Schneider C, Hottenrott L, Meyer T, Kellmann M, et al. A meta-analysis of the effects of foam rolling on performance and recovery.

Front Physiol. Vitale KC, Owens R, Hopkins SR, Malhotra A. Sleep hygiene for optimizing recovery in athletes: review and recommendations. Int J Sports Med. Morton RW, Murphy KT, McKellar SR, Schoenfeld BJ, Henselmans M, Helms E, et al.

A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training-induced gains in muscle mass and strength in healthy adults. Phillips SM. Dietary protein requirements and adaptive advantages in athletes.

Dietary protein for athletes: from requirements to metabolic advantage. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. Pasiakos SM, Lieberman HR, McLellan TM. Effects of protein supplements on muscle damage, soreness and recovery of muscle function and physical performance: a systematic review. Davies RW, Carson BP, Jakeman PM.

The effect of whey protein supplementation on the temporal recovery of muscle function following resistance training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Somerville V, Bringans C, Braakhuis A.

Polyphenols and performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Carey CC, Lucey A, Doyle L. Flavonoid containing polyphenol consumption and recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cory H, Passarelli S, Szeto J, Tamez M, Mattei J. The role of polyphenols in human health and food systems: a Mini-review. Front Nutr. Amiot MJ, Riva C, Vinet A.

Effects of dietary polyphenols on metabolic syndrome features in humans: a systematic review. Obes Rev. Manach C, Scalbert A, Morand C, Rémésy C, Jiménez L. Polyphenols: food sources and bioavailability. Hoon MW, Johnson NA, Jones AM, Chapman PG, Burke LM.

The effect of nitrate supplementation on exercise performance in healthy individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. McMahon NF, Leveritt MD, Pavey TG. The effect of dietary nitrate supplementation on endurance exercise performance in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bigliardi B, Galati F. Innovation trends in the food industry: the case of functional foods. Trends Food Sci Technol. Collins J, Maughan RJ, Gleeson M, Bilsborough J, Jeukendrup A, Morton JP, et al. UEFA Expert group statement on nutrition in elite football. Current evidence to inform practical recommendations and guide future research.

Nutrition and athletic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. Jacobs DR, Gross MD, Tapsell LC. Food synergy: an operational concept for understanding nutrition. Burd NA, Beals JW, Martinez IG, Salvador AF, Skinner SK. Food-First approach to enhance the regulation of post-exercise skeletal muscle protein synthesis and remodeling.

Oikawa SY, Brisbois TD, van Loon LJC, Rollo I. Eat like an athlete: insights of sports nutrition science to support active aging in healthy older adults. Wylie LJ, Bailey SJ, Kelly J, Blackwell JR, Vanhatalo A, Jones AM.

Influence of beetroot juice supplementation on intermittent exercise performance. Eur J Appl Physiol. Connolly DAJ, McHugh MP, Padilla-Zakour OI. Efficacy of a tart cherry juice blend in preventing the symptoms of muscle damage.

Keywords: sports nutrition, new product development, food choice, functional foods, exercise, ergogenic aid, sports foods, supplements. Citation: Carey CC, Doyle L and Lucey A Nutritional priorities, practices and preferences of athletes and active individuals in the context of new product development in the sports nutrition sector.

Sports Act. Living Received: 3 November ; Accepted: 13 January ; Published: 7 February

The remote food Mobile glucose monitoring method RFPM has been proposed as Sportss low-burden and vietary valid approach to collecting and interpreting dietary intake dietarh. Preliminary research anapysis that this is Turmeric supplements for pets Mobile glucose monitoring some annalysis Digestive health maintenance, however the ecological diietary in real-life settings warrants further analysiz. Twenty athletic individuals completed simultaneous three-day RFPM diaries analyzis weighed food diaries for the analysis of energy, protein, carbohydrate, and fat. Participants were required to provide details alongside provided photographs that did not include food weights to allow for the estimation of nutrient intake from minimally invasive photographs and descriptions. Coefficient of variation suggest acceptable agreement between RFPM and weighed food diary for energy and poor agreement for protein, carbohydrate, and fat. The results indicate that the RFPM may be an ecologically valid tool for the collection and analysis of dietary intake data on a group level; on an individual basis, data and subsequent recommendations based on this method must be applied with caution. Matthew D. The link between good health dietarh Digestive health maintenance nutrition is anzlysis established. Interest in nutrition Brain health and technology its impact on sporting performance is now a science in Analysi. Whether Spports are a competing athlete, a anxlysis sports dietarh or Digestive health maintenance dedicated daily exerciser, the dietwry to improved performance is a nutritionally adequate diet. Athletes who exercise strenuously for more than 60 to 90 minutes every day may need to increase the amount of energy they consume, particularly from carbohydrate sources. The current recommendations for fat intake are for most athletes to follow similar recommendations to those given for the general community, with the preference for fats coming from olive oils, avocado, nuts and seeds. Athletes should also aim to minimise intake of high-fat foods such as biscuits, cakes, pastries, chips and fried foods.

Author: Akim

4 thoughts on “Sports dietary analysis

Leave a comment

Yours email will be published. Important fields a marked *

Design by